Location: Montauk Monster

Discussion: The truthReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 2 posts

Posted Anonymously
The truth
Aug 8 2011, 2:42 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 8 2011, 2:42 AM EDT
It's obviously a dead dog with the front part of its face so degraded as to expose the skeleton and nasal cavity. A closer look at the original first image reveals not a beak, but a mandible along with an exposed nasal cavity. The top part of the mouth is missing teeth (holes of absent teeth also visible), which explains the beak illusion.

It's a dog. A poor dead, stray, water-logged dog. Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)

Posted Anonymously
1. RE: The truth
May 19 2012, 1:25 PM EDT | Post edited: May 19 2012, 1:25 PM EDT
that does seem likely, but if that is true...then what's with all the dogs drowning there and coming back decomposed like that, then being misidentified as a monster?
why hasn't that happened elsewhere then, like the great lakes or something?
I'm not saying that you're wrong or that you're right, just saying that even though that seems likely, there's nothing to compare its size to, and it is really odd that this only happens in one place, especially since the dog theory could happen potentially in any water source. Do you find this valuable?