Sign in or 

|
Posted Anonymously |
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
1. RE: harry potter
Sep 12 2011, 4:27 AM EDT
yeah i agree wouldn't it die??
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: harry potter
Sep 12 2011, 4:28 AM EDT
"yeah i agree wouldn't it die??"you are awesome anonymous 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Logic_Chair |
|
|
SupBigNose |
4. RE: harry potter
Sep 12 2011, 9:02 AM EDT
clearly those second two are different people... *nod* and no... because in Harry Potter, if someone looked into its eyes through water, it just got petrified, ergo, it wouldn't have died... and Im pretty sure that snake didn't spend long amounts of time looking into its reflection to make sure it looked finr to go out. It wasn't a teenage girl... so, I doubt it would have stared at the floor to look at its reflection...
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
FlipFlopRagDoll |
5. RE: harry potter
Sep 12 2011, 5:42 PM EDT
GodHatesFags.com
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
SupBigNose |
6. RE: harry potter
Sep 14 2011, 4:34 PM EDT
hmm, whose a ***?
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
7. RE: harry potter
Jan 5 2012, 2:24 AM EST
No because it wasn't the rooster version
Do you find this valuable?
|