Sign in or 
Share this
Showing 6 posts
|
Posted Anonymously |
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
1. RE: mistake
Apr 21 2011, 7:13 PM EDT
I agree. Plus, without even closely looking at the first picture on the page I could tell the three "blurrs" were all female (or a crossdressing male), wearing the same clothes, had the same figure, and had the same hairstyle. Looks to me like stuff we did for fun in photography classes.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: mistake
May 17 2011, 4:39 AM EDT
Well of course the picture with the article is not real! Do a Google search for "Blurrs" and you get NO information about the creature itself. If you can't even find info about the creature, how do you expect to get a picture? It's a made up pic for artistic purposes...aka an artist's rendering.
3
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
Mr.Spiridakos |
3. RE: mistake
Jul 8 2011, 3:11 PM EDT
"Well of course the picture with the article is not real! Do a Google search for "Blurrs" and you get NO information about the creature itself. If you can't even find info about the creature, how do you expect to get a picture? It's a made up pic for artistic purposes...aka an artist's rendering."Yes you are right...you can't find anything about them on google..i have searched on books too about types of ghosts and spirits but again i found nothing about blurrs... Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
4. RE: mistake
Sep 3 2011, 7:02 PM EDT
Thats a little obvious did you really HAVE to post that?
Do you find this valuable?
|
FlipFlopRagDoll |
5. RE: mistake
Sep 3 2011, 7:27 PM EDT
"I doubt this is real. it sounds like crazy people seeing what they want to see. Anyone with bad sight would see "Blurs"."It's just slenderman and his BFF's wearing a different outfit.They thought that the faceless thing and the suit was soooo 20 minutes ago(which I agree with).that' why I've decided to get my very own blur suit. Do you find this valuable? |
