Sign in or 
Share this
Montauk Monster
On the morning of 30th July 2008, a monster has apparently washed up on the beach at Montauk, NY.
Photographs have been released of the bizarre carcass of an unknown creature, hairless, with flippers, teeth and what appears to be a beak.
Well, I'm as much an expert on never-before-seen sea monsters as anyone, so here's what I think. It's either an unknown species, a mutation, something created by evil geniuses in a lab or a hoax. Or a space alien.
In order of unlikeliness...
Unknown species - highly unlikely. For a creature this size to have never been seen before would be amazing, especially as it appears to be mammalian, so it would live around the surface of the sea.
A mutation - very unlikely. For something to mutate this much and yet still live long enough to grow to what seems at least a couple of feet long would take some seriously weird stuff - like being bitten by a radio-active sea-spider or something.
Something created by evil geniuses in a lab - pretty unlikely. I just don't think science is at a stage where we can create our own animals to order. If we can though, I'd like a Tigeroo. It could take me to work in its pouch and it would be great against intruders.
A hoax - most likely. Just because that's what people like to do. It's kind of cool, though.
If it's a space alien, then what's it doing dead on a beach? Did it fall out of the saucer's hatch when they were buzzing the Hamptons looking for someone to abduct?
Courtesy of Asriloth for leading me to the mystery creature.
We've received a lot of different theories about what exactly the Montauk Monster really is (a monster). But one tipster went to so much trouble to assemble a very interesting montage of photos—complete with key encircled highlight areas—that we feel we must bring you their work. "All in all I believe this is no 'monster' or 'Satan' simply a case of mistaken identity," the tipster writes. The monster is not Satan? Ridiculous, we know. But when you get a load of the included X-ray, well, it certainly gives the misguided nonbelievers something to think about.
See below the photo presentation in favor of what we are now calling "The Vole Theory":
Photographs have been released of the bizarre carcass of an unknown creature, hairless, with flippers, teeth and what appears to be a beak.
Well, I'm as much an expert on never-before-seen sea monsters as anyone, so here's what I think. It's either an unknown species, a mutation, something created by evil geniuses in a lab or a hoax. Or a space alien.
In order of unlikeliness...
Unknown species - highly unlikely. For a creature this size to have never been seen before would be amazing, especially as it appears to be mammalian, so it would live around the surface of the sea.
A mutation - very unlikely. For something to mutate this much and yet still live long enough to grow to what seems at least a couple of feet long would take some seriously weird stuff - like being bitten by a radio-active sea-spider or something.
Something created by evil geniuses in a lab - pretty unlikely. I just don't think science is at a stage where we can create our own animals to order. If we can though, I'd like a Tigeroo. It could take me to work in its pouch and it would be great against intruders.
A hoax - most likely. Just because that's what people like to do. It's kind of cool, though.
If it's a space alien, then what's it doing dead on a beach? Did it fall out of the saucer's hatch when they were buzzing the Hamptons looking for someone to abduct?
Courtesy of Asriloth for leading me to the mystery creature.
POTENTIAL UPDATE!!
We've received a lot of different theories about what exactly the Montauk Monster really is (a monster). But one tipster went to so much trouble to assemble a very interesting montage of photos—complete with key encircled highlight areas—that we feel we must bring you their work. "All in all I believe this is no 'monster' or 'Satan' simply a case of mistaken identity," the tipster writes. The monster is not Satan? Ridiculous, we know. But when you get a load of the included X-ray, well, it certainly gives the misguided nonbelievers something to think about.
See below the photo presentation in favor of what we are now calling "The Vole Theory":
Montauk Monster II
Below are two pictures of the second specimen found. (Thought it might help as a visual aide instead of referring to it in the threads as "they found a second one.") There are still no legitimate claims to the "animals" and scientists/researchers, etc. are still trying to figure out what exactly they are or could be. Any theories or suggestions? Some of the popular ones as of late are dead American Pitbull, mutated pig, genetic experiment gone wrong, and so on and so forth.
* I do not own these pictures! They came from different sites and I hold no claim to them.*
* I do not own these pictures! They came from different sites and I hold no claim to them.*
AVMidian |
Latest page update: made by AVMidian
, Jun 30 2009, 12:38 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Spell Check
- AVMidian
6 words added 1 word deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | this creature (page: 1 2 3 4 5 ... last page) | 540 | Wednesday, 4:38 AM EST by SupBigNose | ||
|
|
Thread started: Jul 11 2009, 11:09 PM EDT
Watch
This Unknown creature could be a New animal that has never before been seen...Or a alien....an alien pig,, i would never have guessed. but anyway I think its either a new speices of animal or a alien. thasts just my guess...lol
But it looks soo cool |
||||
| Anonymous | The second body | 0 | Tuesday, 9:00 PM EST by Anonymous | ||
|
|
Thread started: Tuesday, 9:00 PM EST
Watch
Considering the nose construction and the formation of the ears since they are fallen, along with the head pressure crest, its almost certainly the american swine. a male one at that. if correct only 2 years old or so when he died. a nearby slaughterhouse, farm, etc. most likely lost him and he ended up drowning causing the rot and decay to sink to the bone at diferent speeds due to submersed parts and unsubmersed parts of the body.
|
||||
| Anonymous | Dead Racoon? | 0 | Tuesday, 2:26 PM EST by Anonymous | ||
|
|
Thread started: Tuesday, 2:26 PM EST
Watch
I belive they have proven this to be a dead racoon. It's hard to tell from the photo though, no one can tell for certain what size it is exactly.
|
||||
Showing 3 of 7 threads for this page
- view all
