universaldragonlord |

Evolution

universaldragonlord

universaldragonlord
Evolution
Feb 24 2009, 5:37 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 24 2009, 5:37 AM EST
If Darwin is right how come many creatures have come through virtually unchanged.
Do you find this valuable?    
Dous777
Dous777
1. RE: Evolution
Feb 24 2009, 9:36 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 24 2009, 9:36 AM EST
Evolution is random. It's not that there weren't changes, it's that there weren't successful changes and therefore the species could not evolve.
Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous
2. RE: Evolution
Feb 25 2009, 6:18 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 25 2009, 6:18 AM EST
All creatures evolve and a crocodile today is different to a crocodile of pre-historic times. My point is that it is still a crocodile not a pig or a bear. A pre-historic horse is still a horse creatures evolve to fill a natural niche and give them a better chance of survival but it does not change the basic nature of the creature.
Do you find this valuable?    
Dous777
Dous777
3. RE: Evolution
Feb 25 2009, 12:29 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 25 2009, 12:29 PM EST
If that is your point then Darwin is still right. These creature have still evolved, as in new adaptations, but not enough new adaptations to be considered a new species.
Do you find this valuable?    
universaldragonlord

universaldragonlord
4. RE: Evolution
Feb 26 2009, 3:26 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 26 2009, 3:26 AM EST
Im not implying that evolution dosn't exist just that spiecies do not change to the extent that an ameoba becomes a land walking mammal no matter what the time evolved Darwin makes leaps that cannot logicaly be explained.
Do you find this valuable?    
Dous777
Dous777
5. RE: Evolution
Feb 26 2009, 10:45 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 26 2009, 10:45 AM EST
That sounds like a similar arguement to the evolution of the eye. I believe scientists have found animals (or at least fossils) denoting all the major points of the evolution of the eye, showing complicated leaps are possible.
Or you could take what I think, God gave evolution a little push.
Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous
6. RE: Evolution
Feb 27 2009, 10:31 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 27 2009, 10:31 AM EST
If your asking if I believe in God then the answer is yes as the first law of physics proves his existence but that is not the point I am making I just feel that sometimes science makes claims that do not stand up and although I take the point of the eye that does not justify the spiecies leap.
Do you find this valuable?    
Dous777
Dous777
7. RE: Evolution
Feb 27 2009, 12:46 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 27 2009, 12:46 PM EST
You have a specific example of where it doesn't add up?
Do you find this valuable?